Estimation of Liabilites in Commutation (30 November 2011)

Rating 1 = Excellent 5 = Poor	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	1.55
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	1.55
What did you think of the venue, directions, facilities, catering and training room?	1.53
How would you rate the overall organisation of the event?	1.33*
*I especially appreciated the update on potential disruption from the protests

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Subject met the course title perfectly

Very relevant and interesting

Graham Oswald & David Butman opened up with "Valuation of US asbestos & pollution liabilites at an assured level", how was this received?

David made it easy to understand the (complicated) US legal system and Graham was clear & made it very accessable

What did you think of the presentation "Valuation of an Insurers liability to US asbestos & pollution claims" with Elinore O'Neill & Molly McGinnis Stine

Good intereaction

Well explained and engaging

Was there enough time for questions?

Ample. The speakers & facilitators brilliantly available and approachable during breaks

Capital Management for Legacy Professionals (11 October 2011)

Rating 1 = Excellent 5 = Poor	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	1.83
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	1.75
How would you rate the presentation " The Risk of Debt Purchase" with Steve Ryland?	1.67
How would you find the session "Managing the Reinsurance Asset" with Ed Stanley?	1.42
How would you rate the overall organisation of the event?	1.5

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Interesting - it drew me here and variety, different views

How useful did you find the presentation"Broker Replacement" by Steve Goate?

Extremely useful and interesting

Lots of detail but well thought

How was the session "Moving the team - or just moving on?" by our last minute stand in Daniel Burne?

Very good presentation and interesting

Well presented and quite interesting - but irrelevant to me

Good general information

Handling Asbestos Claims in 2011 (05 April 2011)

Rating 1 = Excellent 5 = Poor	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	1.55
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	1.82
What did you think of the venue, directions, facilities, catering and training room?	1.28
How would you rate the overall organisation of the event?	1.54

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Very relevant and useful for me, especially legal updates (both US & UK)

What did you think of the presentation "The principles" with Peter Taylor and David Newmann?

Interesting & informative

Excellent way to commence proceedings. Interesting to hear the US view in good detail; UK talk was interesting and thought provoking

A good marriage between the presenters

David in particular was excellent. A fascinating update on the US

How well did the "UK Asbestos" session go with Daniel Heaton?

Presenter was clear and there was a logical path to his presentation. Interesting stuff

How would you rate the presentation "Actuarial considerations - how big is the problem?" with Patrick Nolan?

Good projections and information from various sources

Very good presenter. Made complicated ideas easy to understand and interesting

Difficult subject to get across but Patrick did well

---

Non-Executive Directors Solvency II Course (10 March 2011)

 A Presentation for Non Executive Directors on Key Developments and Implications of Solvency II

I thought the NED/Solvency II event yesterday was absolutely excellent and easily exceeded my expectations. All the speakers were good but the two from PwC were exceptional. The only possible improvement would have been a different seating arrangement - say a horseshoe, to encourage more participation. I would say this event should be considered essential for any NEDs in the insurance sector, live or run-off.
NG

As the role of NED becomes more onerous I was disappointed that this course did not get more participants.  I certainly found that my concerns, regarding L&D, were completely well founded and that in fact there is much more to this element than even my pessimistic run-off training view could handle.
LAG

---

Schemes of Arrangement & Part VII's (11 November 2010)

Scoring: 5 excellent 1 poor	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	4.50
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	4.30
How would you rate the presentation "Legal Framework of Schemes" with Nigel Montgomery?	4.57
How did you find the Panel Session "Schemes are they fair?" with Mike Durkin, Nigel Montgomery, John Waldrop and Anne Ware?	4.46
How would you rate the overall organisation of the event?	4.48

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Useful & topical

Informative

Very interesting and current to run-off market

How well do you think the course met its objectives?

Speakers very knowledgeable

Very good overview of Schemes and Part VII transfers with some more elements of detail where necessary

Very good mix between presentations, interactive and panel sessions

What did you think of the interactive session "Key Scheme Features" led by Barry Gale?

It would have been helpful to go through/identify any aspects which were not picked up by the groups

Good to get an interactive discussion going

This was very useful - it was good to think about the good and bad points of scheme docs with people who have lots of knowledge and experience in this field

---

Tomorrow's Claims: 2010 and beyond (07 October 2010)

	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	1.39
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	1.41
Did the mediation session led by Kiran Soar work well?	100% vote
How would you rate the overall organisation of the event?	1.28

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Good variety of subjects within the course

Lots covered in a day

What did you think of the current claims issues session from David Abbott?

Very interesting and relevant

A real insight into current issues and case studies

How well did the "Managing Disputes" session go with Clive O'Connell?

Liked the targets and real life stories

Did you feel that the overall level of the presentations took into account today's delegates knowledge?

Varied expertise but good mix of topics in terms of detail and assumed prior knowledge

---

TIMEBAR WORKSHOP (24 May 2010)

	Average
Question	Rating
What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?	1.35
How well do you think the course met its objectives?	1.54
How useful did you find the summary and review of the cases?	1.50
Did you feel that the overall level of the presentations took into account today's delegates knowledge? (Please Circle)	y=26

Typical comments received

What did you think of the choice of subject for the course?

Excellent

Useful and interesting subject

How well do you think the course met its objectives?

Very well

Course met objectives, updated and clarified position on timebar

How would you rate the interaction opening session;Timebar Case Studies?

Very good, caused some good debate

Useful practical to assist understanding

Working in groups allowed for good debate, was useful to have the facilitators on our table

Were the team mediators useful? Please add comments.

Yes, answered my questions, provided good feedback

Very good. Right level of interaction, not just telling us the answers

Helped to direct our discussions

---

ACTUARIAL ESTIMATIONS OF LIABILITIES IN COMMUTATIONS (2 December 2009)

Summary of feedback forms 

Ratings: 1 = Excellent ; 5 = Poor

Typical comments received

APH CLAIMS: THE NEVER ENDING STORY (7 May 2009)

TOMORROW'S LEGACY:2009 AND BEYOND (24 March 2009)